September 11: Consequences For Canada -book Review

Book Re make - family line 11 : Consequences for Canada by Kent rophy . 2003 Montreal and Kingston : McGill-Queen s University Press . 272 pagesKent cockroach provides a masterful analytical thinking of the changes shaping Canadian politics in the race of the September 11 , 2001 (henceforth , 9 /11 ) terrorist strikes . His central floor is to search to what degree changes had occurred in post-9 /11 Canada from a ratified and governmental point of view . To substantiate the same , Roach looks at Canadian legislatings since Black Tuesday and the greater policy-related questions of military faculty , immigration and foreign policy p The terrorist strikes of 9 /11 in the USA - the World Trade Center in bare-ass York and the Pentagon in Washington D .C . - have served to establish a invigorated of international relations , marked by a palpable fear of catastrophic terrorism , the apprehension of pro flavourration of weapons of trade destruction to non-state actors much(prenominal) as the bag , and the burgeoning War on Terror The question remains , fifty-fifty so , as to whether this fight marks the emergence of a hitherto unknown curse or only the etching of an exist affliction into popular perception . Kent Roach challenges conventional acquaintance to take the last mentioned view , saying that the novelty of 9 /11 was the exposure that it instilled in the minds of the west in world-wide , and North Americans in particular . For the author the attacks only quicken a takings of pre-existing attacks already faced by Canada (Roach , 15Indeed , Roach s abbreviation is somewhat supportable in view of long-drawn problems with terrorism elsewhere in the world , especially in the Middle easterly , South Asia and Africa . What 9 /11 changed , stock-still , was the response of countri es , especially the USA and Canada , to the ! threat of terrorism . A substantial mess of Roach s book deals with the post-9 /11 changes in Canadian legislation , especially the hastily passed Anti-Terrorism Act ( exposition C-36 ) of 2001 .

A review of Canada s pre-Bill C-36 iniquitous laws reveals that the same already jeopardize the most severe punishments , including life imprisonment . In such a situation , Bill C-36 only managed to enlarge the domain of the state s power in arbitrarily identifying several kinds of activities - even anti-globalization protests and illegal strikes (Roach 2003 : 5 ) - as terrorist behavior . This was in guardianship w ith the sweeping changes that mevery countries fleetly instituted in to deal with the specter of the new transnational superterrorist (Cotler . In effect , all that the new charge up succeeded in doing was to change the particular nature of crimesRoach s legal psychoanalysis is remarkably hale . He maintains that the functional problems of instituting the Anti-Terrorism Act in front any complementary color consequence management efforts indicates the Canadian government was too importunate to publicly display that needful measures were being taken to overlay the threat of terrorism . This preoccupation with actors (terrorists , rather than their actions (terrorism , worries Roach near the future prospects of minority rights and civic liberties that have been so closely guarded through Canada s historyIt is to a fault difficult to establish any correlation...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPap er.com

If you want to get a full essay, ! visit our page: write my paper