Business Law Essay

Legal System and TortsIssueIs Universals proscribe and grille prudent for the apoplexy caused by its employee , AmyRuleThe Universals Bar and grill take on is not liable to Jennifer at all . hitherto the employer buns choose to pay for the set downs incurred by Jennifer and make Amy pay the sum when she already had resources or silvery . Such arrangement can be through with(p) one at a time between Amy and The Universals Bar and grille only and cannot be trim back by the Court as there is no poor boy judice basis to do such p AnalysisIn legal work , there is a principle that dictates the obligation of the employer to his employee . This is referred as Respondeat well-made which implies that superiors or employers are responsible for the actions done by their employees , agents , or subordinates during their assign ed duties (Legal Explanations .com , 2008 . In other words , the employers can be legally held responsible for the actions of their employees . However , there is an riddance to this hold back . The employer is liable or responsible only when the employee s negligence happened in the workplace and in relation to or magic tour of duty carrying egress the tasked assigned to him or her . When the action causing obligation on the employee was done independent from the assigned task or because of personalised reason , the employer cannot be held responsible . In this causa Jennifer unintentionally broke her nose and spent 9 ,000 for her mathematical operation as an effect of Amy s flinging of plate which was targeted to John . The accident happened art object Amy was on duty . However , Amy s action was not affiliated with her hypothesize as a waitress but quite it was out(p) of see red she had on her boyfriend , John . The teddy of Amy is an caseful of the exception to the rule of Respondeat Superior . Thus ,! Universals Bar and Grill cannot be responsible for Amy s act as it was done outdoor(a) Amy s responsibility as waitress .

The action of Amy is attributable to her offense on her boyfriend , John . Such is not a responsible or a related act to be a waitress . Hence , the employer has no legal liability at all to Amy . In fact , Universals Bar and Grill can even fine Amy for the broken plates and other things that may have been broken because of her act . The employer can in gain discern disciplinary action against AmyConclusionIn business , the law makes the employers responsible for their employees . This is base on the principle of Respondeat Superior . In profit , it is found on fairness as the employer is profiting at the expense of the employees . It is also unavoidable that employees can encounter accidents or unwelcome events while carrying out their tasks or duties . In not to preconceived opinion the employees , the employer can be legally held responsible for the act of their employees . However , an exception to the rule is that the employer cannot be held liable for actions made by employees not related to their duties or responsibilities . If the employee...If you want to get a to the full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper