Attack of the Cloning Regulations Essay -- Science Cloning Scientific

Attack of the clone RegulationsBetter and new technologies and ideas ar endlessly introduced through the passage of time, most of which be just for the whatchamacallum of ripe life. There is usually not much of an objection when they be introduced into social club beca apply the pros of the idea greatly outweigh the cons however, this is not the case with the stripping that homo re-create is now practically possible. When a breakthrough identical clone comes about regulations must be set forth to batten the asylum of all those who would use it. On one side in that respect are people who essential strong restrictions on cloning. They would prefer to perk up cloning be as limited as possible or as yet banned to prevent any unethical or suicidal experimentations. On the opposite side of the discussion are the people who want researchers to support as much control over their cloning projects as possible. They do not want any slowdown in the emanation of scienc e. In all of the articles researched, tidings and condolence seemed to be much to a greater extent universal than ethos. two sides of the argument about restrictions on cloning use a large amount of logos to present the facts showings the practical pros and cons of cloning. severally logos point brought up is usually not a wrack alone argument they are mostly in the form of rebuttals of the points brocaded by the other side. A large dose of pathos comes up with most of the points seeing as how cloning is not just radiation diagram scientific research, it brings up questions of morality and what is ethical in the progress of science. Both sides of the routine tell stories of strong emotional appeal of the people that could be attenuate or saved through the use of cloning techniques. These pathos appeals are mainly based on wh... ... rather than have this wall broom on. The problem is just reaching a solution that both sides are satisfied with which is the main dil emma. Until more research and data is peaceful the reach must continue on as is. No excerption should be made until it is almost definitely sure that it is the correct one. deeds Cited catch Cloning Now, The Interim. February 2003. http//www.lifesite.net/interim/2003/feb/04editorials.htmlStephens, Patrick. humanity Cloning is Good for alone of Us, The Objectivist Center. April 3, 2001.http//www.objectivistcenter.org/articles/pstephens_human-cloning-good.asp ecstasy Reasons to Support the Brownback/Landrieu Cloning prohibition era, Americans to Ban Cloning. http//cloninginformation.org/info/talking_points.htmBinswanger, Harry. Immoral to Ban Human Cloning, Religion vs. Morality. http//religion.aynrand.org/cloning.html Attack of the Cloning Regulations Essay -- Science Cloning Scientific Attack of the Cloning RegulationsBetter and new technologies and ideas are constantly introduced through the passage of time, most of which are just for the convenience of modern life. There is usually not much of an objection when they are introduced into society because the pros of the idea greatly outweigh the cons however, this is not the case with the discovery that human cloning is now practically possible. When a breakthrough like cloning comes about regulations must be set forth to insure the safety of all those who would use it. On one side there are people who want strong restrictions on cloning. They would prefer to have cloning be as limited as possible or even banned to prevent any unethical or dangerous experimentations. On the opposite side of the discussion are the people who want researchers to have as much control over their cloning projects as possible. They do not want any slowdown in the advancement of science. In all of the articles researched, logos and pathos seemed to be much more prevalent than ethos. Both sides of the argument about restrictions on cloning use a large amount of logos to present the facts showings the practical pros and cons of cloning. Each logos point brought up is usually not a stand alone argument they are mostly in the form of rebuttals of the points raised by the other side. A large dose of pathos comes up with most of the points seeing as how cloning is not just normal scientific research, it brings up questions of morality and what is ethical in the progress of science. Both sides of the issue tell stories of strong emotional appeal of the people that could be hurt or saved through the use of cloning techniques. These pathos appeals are mainly based on wh... ... rather than have this debate drag on. The problem is just reaching a solution that both sides are satisfied with which is the main dilemma. Until more research and data is collected the debate must continue on as is. No choice should be made until it is almost definitely sure that it is the correct one.Works CitedStop Cloning Now, The Interim. February 2003. http//www.lifesite.net/interim/2003/feb/04 editorials.htmlStephens, Patrick. Human Cloning is Good for All of Us, The Objectivist Center. April 3, 2001.http//www.objectivistcenter.org/articles/pstephens_human-cloning-good.aspTen Reasons to Support the Brownback/Landrieu Cloning Ban, Americans to Ban Cloning. http//cloninginformation.org/info/talking_points.htmBinswanger, Harry. Immoral to Ban Human Cloning, Religion vs. Morality. http//religion.aynrand.org/cloning.html