Einstein Essay Essay

The reason she would have most promising be asking this interrogatory is probably because the world at the time is qualifying through tough times such as The Depression and it besides being post World War 1 era. minds response to Phylliss question was inefficacious because it lacks ethos, pity, and it did not give a straight forward come to the question.The lack of ethos do the strain less(prenominal) effective because however though Albert Einstein is one of the most historied scientists of the twentieth century, he did not tell any credibility that he had towards the argument. Yes he might have won a Nobel Prize for Physics, but that does not mean he knows anything about religion, also being the plainly scientist responding to Phylliss question, Einstein does not necessarily have the correct answer because he does not give the point-of-view of the other scientists.Yes, Einstein was most likely one of the only known scientist at the time, and for that reason he would be the go-to guy, for this question, but that does not give him much credibility for this question. The lack of pathos make the argument less effective because he did not show any emotion towards the reader, Phyllis Wright. Einstein should have showed more compassion towards Phyllis because she was merely a 6th grader, not one of his colleagues. Yes, Einstein had many accompaniments on why scientists may or may not pray, but by the way he worded the response, it seemed that he did not take into consideration that Phyllis was in effect(p) a young girl.He also says that a research scientist volition hardly be inclined to believe that events could be influenced by a prayer, thus making it seem that there was no reason for Phyllis to even ask the question, thus making her feel like she just pointless his time asking him the question. His answer too was not straightforward, due to how he would say one thing and then went on saying more or lessthing else that would go against his fi rst argument by doing this he is making it difficult for Phyllis to track what he is trying to say.If he were to use more pathos the argument would be more effective because it allows the reader to feel what the writer is feeling. Einstein did not lack logos, but he did fail to give a straight forward answer which in turn made the made the argument ineffective. He uses the Red Herring Fallacy in revisal to divert prudence from the original question. For example he stated the popular opinion in the existence of basic all-embracing laws in Nature also rests on a sort of faith which has nothing to do with the question on whether scientist pray or not.Using this fallacy makes Phylliss attention to her question divert from whether or not scientist pray to, whether or not there is a god. Einsteins use of logos was employ greatly throughout his argument, but he must remember that he is lecture to a young girl and should not be talking to her as if it was one of his colleagues, so the re is a chance that she did not comprehend the argument thoroughly. Because Einsteins argument lacked ethos and pathos, as soundly as not giving a straight forward answer, it was ineffective.The fact that he lacked ethos, made this essay ineffective because being a scientist does not give him any credibility towards religion. The lack of pathos, made this argument ineffective because he needs to make the reader feel the way he felt while writing this response. The way he worded the response made the argument unclear of what he wanted to say, which made the reader timid of what his stand on the question was. Ethos, pathos, and logos are all incumbent when attempting to make an effective argument, but Einstein seemed to have left some of these key factors out of his argument.